Application Networking

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Cisco UCS X-Series Energy Efficiency Offer

 

Forum Posts

Hi:I have the following configuration. Although the users can hit the web server, the stickiness doesn't work.sticky http-cookie TEST1 TEST1 timeout 300 replicate sticky serverfarm PROXYpolicy-map type loadbalance first-match L7_TEMPORAL class HTTP-T...

admin_2 by Level 7
  • 957 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

When I put the one of the real servers in outofservice mode, slb works. But when I put the server switchport to shutdown to simulate server down, slb does not work. It keeps on trying to look for the server that it last established the session with a...

rfzulueta by Community Member
  • 695 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

VIP: 10.1.1.1:80real service 1: 192.1.1.1:80real service 2: 192.1.1.2:80user IP: 10.2.2.1CSS ver 8.2when user opens a web-browser connection to http://10.1.1.1, he always gets attached to 192.1.1.1 unless he closes the browser and opens a new one onl...

aolabisi by Level 1
  • 1319 Views
  • 5 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

HiCould someone inform me how a CSS 11500 handles a packet with TCP invalid checksum. I have two loadbalanced svrs behind a CSS and im seeing the and ACK with a bad checksum hitting the server VLAN interface of the CSS which appears to send RST 200 m...

Hi,I have a problem with the configuration of the Serverside alias IP Address. When I configure the IP Address of the Server Side Vlan to .1 everything works fine. But when I change the Vlan IP Address to .3 and confige the alias IP Address to .1 I c...

pprade by Community Member
  • 932 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

For one possible deployment, a customer has a main site, a branch site, and a DR site. The topology I'm looking at is:Controller at main siteWAE 512 at main siteWAE 512 at DR siteIOS NM WAE at branch siteTwo questions: 1) Will the main site 512 act a...

rburkholder by Community Member
  • 847 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi,We are using CNR for DNS and DHCPv6 and would like to handout v6 network prefixes of /119 or /120 to Windows 2003 (SP2) clients. Question is will the MS 2003 clients accept a network prefix of other than /64? (Sorry I understand this is NOT an M$ ...

fsebera by Level 9
  • 1087 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes