04-27-2005 06:10 AM
Hello all,
I have configured my 6500 as per Gilles advice (topic CSM and FWSM), and something strange is happening. I can access the servers directly, but not via VIP (I can ping the VIP).
This is a 6513 with one CSM and one FWSM. There are interface-vlans on the FWSM and the CSM is bridging vlans 14 and 50; vlan 50 doesn't have an interface on the MSFC.
The config follows:
module ContentSwitchingModule 7
vlan 14 client
ip address 10.200.240.54 255.255.255.0
gateway 10.200.240.1
!
vlan 50 server
ip address 10.200.240.54 255.255.255.0
!
probe TESTE1 http
request method get
interval 3
failed 3
port 80
!
real LAPTOP
address 10.200.240.230
inservice
real TESTE1
address 10.200.240.12
inservice
!
serverfarm TESTE1
nat server
no nat client
real name TESTE1
inservice
real name LAPTOP
inservice
probe TESTE1
!
vserver TESTE1
virtual 10.200.240.231 tcp www
serverfarm TESTE1
persistent rebalance
inservice
gateway 10.200.240.1 is the FWSM.
I have captured packets with a sniffer on the server LAPTOP and the packets that reach the server come from IP 10.200.240.54 (the CSM interface on the client vlan). Shouldn't they come directly from the origin client?
If I create a interface vlan on the MSFC for vlan 50 it works. Could you explain?
Thanks,
Marcio
04-27-2005 08:12 AM
what you see coming from ip x.x.x.54 is probes from the CSM.
Looks like your traffic is coming in via the msfc and going out via the firewall, which will block it.
I don't think you should have a vlan 14 nor a vlan 50 on the MSFC since the default gateway in this case is the FWSM.
So verify that traffic from clients come through firewall and not via MSFC.
Then check with a 'sho mod csm X vserver name TESTE1 detail' if you have traffic coming in and if the CSM sees the response from the server.
Also capture a 'sho mod csm X conn detail' and check incoming and outgoing vlan and make sure there is no asymetric paths.
Gilles.
04-28-2005 05:48 AM
Gilles,
This will follow the topology "CSM inline and MSFC not involved"?
Thanks,
Marcio
04-28-2005 11:16 PM
in our documentation, where we rerefence the different designs, we use the MSFC because we need 1 gateway and it makes sense to use the MSFC.
But in your case you have a FWSM, and in this case, it makes more sense to use the FWSM as the gateway since all traffic needs to go through the firewall anyway.
Gilles.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide