Does this config seem kosher? Using arrowpoint-cookie for
a vip with url http://web1, but we also want to redirect anything
to http://web1/static/ to separate content which is also using
arrowpoint-cookie, load balancing to two other services. It seems like
the css is doing the right thing, issuing an arrowpoint cookie for
http://web1, then it will modify the cookie when I hit http://web1/static/
but haven't seen anything like this in the docs so I'm wondering if
I'm asking for trouble.
We are using a css 11151 with version 5.00 Build 105.
Here is the config:
content web1-80
vip address 10.0.1.10
balance weightedrr
add service server1-80 weight 4
add service server2-80 weight 4
add service server3-80 weight 2
add service server4-80 weight 4
add service server5-80 weight 4
advanced-balance arrowpoint-cookie
protocol tcp
port 80
url "/*"
active
content web1-static-80
vip address 10.0.1.10
add service server4-7084
add service server5-7085
advanced-balance arrowpoint-cookie
protocol tcp
port 80
url "/static/*"
active
service server1-80
ip address 192.168.1.1
port 80
keepalive type tcp
keepalive port 80
keepalive frequency 60
string 111p801111
act
service server2-80
ip address 192.168.1.2
port 80
keepalive type tcp
keepalive port 80
keepalive frequency 60
string 222p802222
act
service server3-80
ip address 192.168.1.3
port 80
keepalive type tcp
keepalive port 80
keepalive frequency 60
string 333p803333
act
service server4-80
ip address 192.168.1.4
port 80
keepalive type tcp
keepalive port 80
keepalive frequency 60
string 444p804444
act
service server5-80
ip address 192.168.1.5
port 80
keepalive type tcp
keepalive port 80
keepalive frequency 60
string 555p805555
act
service server4-7084
ip address 192.168.1.4
port 7084
keepalive type tcp
keepalive port 7084
keepalive frequency 60
string 444p7084444
act
service server5-7085
ip address 192.168.1.5
port 7085
keepalive type tcp
keepalive port 7085
keepalive frequency 60
string 555p7085555
act
Thanks
-Dan
