cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Bookmark
|
Subscribe
|
450
Views
0
Helpful
5
Replies

css11503 switchover

xuan.z
Level 1
Level 1

two css11503 with box-to-box redundancy,they swithovered there times,what reasons should cause box-to-box swithover?

5 Replies 5

Gilles Dufour
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

could you send a 'sho redundancy'.

Some of the possible reasons :

- critical service went down

- faulty cable on the redundancy link

- CSS redundancy link going through a switch [not supported config] and the switch had a problem

- human manipulation error

show redundancy and log file should give you the reason.

Regards,

Gilles

CSS11503# sh redundancy

Redundancy: Enabled Redundancy Protocol: Running

Redundancy State: Master MasterMode: No

Number of times redundancy state changed to Master: 2

to Backup: 2

Redundancy interface: 192.168.0.129

Current State Duration: 2 days 17:26:11

Last Fail Reason: No Fail

VRID: 128 Priority: 100

Physical Link Failure Monitor on :

Interface: State

2/1 Up

1/2 Up

the last reason was "no fail",i cann't find the reason.

what about the other side ?

Did you capture the same info ?

What does it show ?

If nothing there, check the log file.

Regards,

Gilles.

hi,gdufour,it's the same info on the other side.and there are many down and alive of service infos in log file.

I don't down if ti is a software problem.

CSS11503_p1# sh ver

Version: sg0720405 (7.20 Build 405)

Flash (Locked): 7.10 Build 102

Flash (Operational): 7.20 Build 405

Type: PRIMARY

Licensed Cmd Set(s): Standard Feature Set

Secure Management

CSS11503_p2# sh ver

Version: sg0720405 (7.20 Build 405)

Flash (Locked): 7.10 Build 102

Flash (Operational): 7.20 Build 405

Type: PRIMARY

Licensed Cmd Set(s): Standard Feature Set

Secure Management

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card