Gilles,
In box-box redundancy is it recommended to define redundancy on all the circuits in the CSS ?
As i want to manage the Master and Backup individually and to get the access for both Boxes i am not defining redundancy on Management circuit.
Please look in to the configuration and suggest me whether it is recommended or not.
Master device
interface 1/1
trunk
description "Trunk Client VLANs"
phy 1Gbits-FD-no-pause
vlan 410
vlan 440
vlan 816
interface 1/2
phy 1Gbits-FD-no-pause
bridge vlan 900
description "app session"
!************************** CIRCUIT **************************
circuit VLAN410
redundancy
ip address 200.200.200.69 255.255.255.192
circuit VLAN440
DESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT PURPOSE
ip address 10.25.230.8 255.255.255.128
circuit VLAN900
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
redundancy-protocol
Backup- device
interface 1/1
trunk
description "Trunk Client VLANs"
phy 1Gbits-FD-no-pause
vlan 410
vlan 440
vlan 816
interface 1/2
phy 1Gbits-FD-no-pause
bridge vlan 900
description "app session"
!************************** CIRCUIT **************************
circuit VLAN410
redundancy
ip address 200.200.200.69 255.255.255.192
circuit VLAN440
DESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT PURPOSE
ip address 10.25.230.9 255.255.255.128
circuit VLAN900
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
redundancy-protocol
Thanks in advance
