08-06-2010 01:02 PM
Which one it the better choice...?
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-09-2010 06:42 PM
I am not sure what the point is...?? That document is a little dated. According to the caveat section it is based on 4.0.3 release.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Data_Center/WAASDC11.html#wp102380
Thanks,
Eric Rose
08-06-2010 01:07 PM
WAE--512#sh tfo detail
Policy Engine Config Item Value
------------------------- -----
State Registered
Default Action Use Policy
Connection Limit 1500
Effective Limit 1490
Keepalive timeout 3.0 seconds
WAE--512#
NO-HOSTNAME#sh tfo detail
Policy Engine Config Item Value
------------------------- -----
State Registered
Default Action Use Policy
Connection Limit 1300
Effective Limit 1300
Keepalive timeout 3.0 seconds
NO-HOSTNAME#
But i wonder is the 512 gonna be around for awhile ...
08-09-2010 07:05 AM
The WAVE-574 is a newer model and it also has the Virtual Blade support.
Thanks.
Eric Rose
08-09-2010 07:12 AM
Yes but we dont ever plan on using the Virtual Blade...The 512's are 850 bucks cheaper to us and offer 190 more TFO connections then the 574..What i wanted to make sure before i deploy is that Cisco isnt gonna axe these anytime soon...
08-09-2010 07:20 AM
From the 4.2.1 sizing guidelines. The 574 supports more connections.
The 512 with 2GB of RAM support 1200 connections
The 574 with 6GB of RAM support 1300 connections
Your screen capture is that on the same version of software?
08-09-2010 07:41 AM
yup all 4.1.5f..
OE512
WAE-X-512#sh tfo detail
Policy Engine Config Item Value
------------------------- -----
State Registered
Default Action Use Policy
Connection Limit 1500
Effective Limit 1490
Keepalive timeout 3.0 seconds
WAE-X-512#sh inventory
PID: WAE-512-K9 VID: 0
WAE-X-512#
WAE-X-512#sh ver
Cisco Wide Area Application Services Software (WAAS)
Copyright (c) 1999-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cisco Wide Area Application Services Software Release 4.1.5f (build b2 Apr 20 2010)
Version: oe512-4.1.5f.2
Compiled 12:26:34 Apr 20 2010 by cnbuild
System was restarted on Sat Jun 5 21:50:52 2010.
The system has been up for 9 weeks, 1 day, 12 hours, 50 minutes, 3 seconds.
WAE-X-512#
Now if upgrading to 4.2.1 will bring my connections down to 1200 that’s unacceptable
08-09-2010 07:46 AM
Ok the sizing guide from 4.1.5 also shows 1200 and 1300 for connection limits. I am not sure about the output
Will have to let somebody from the BU/Support comment.
Thanks.
08-09-2010 07:47 AM
In the
Ordering Guide for Cisco WAAS dated
June 11, 2010
its says
WAE-512-K9
TCP connectionsTCP connections
750 - 1500
● Cisco WAE-512 with chassis with 1 GB SDRAM, 1
250-GB HDD, and AC power supply
●
Additional memory and HDDs available for higher
optimized TCP connection count and RAID-1
redundancy; virtual blades are not supported
US$12,500
08-09-2010 07:55 AM
08-09-2010 08:13 AM
Page 5 of 5..
When the Application Optimizers are disabled the maximum TCP connections for the following platform is as
follow: NME 502 - 500 , NME 522 - 800, 512-1GB - 750, 512-3G - 1500, 612-2G - 2000, 612-4G - 6000.
What does that really mean ?
WAE-X-512#sh accelerator
Accelerator Licensed Config State Operational State
----------- -------- ------------ -----------------
cifs Yes Enabled Running
epm Yes Enabled Running
http Yes Enabled Running
mapi Yes Enabled Running
nfs Yes Enabled Running
ssl Yes Enabled Running
video No Enabled Shutdown
wafs-core Yes Disabled Shutdown
wafs-edge Yes Disabled Shutdown
WAE-X-512#
08-09-2010 09:01 AM
My guess would be when transport license is used and/or when all AO are disabled.
08-09-2010 02:01 PM
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Data_Center/WAASDC11.html#wp80841
08-09-2010 06:42 PM
I am not sure what the point is...?? That document is a little dated. According to the caveat section it is based on 4.0.3 release.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Data_Center/WAASDC11.html#wp102380
Thanks,
Eric Rose
08-10-2010 05:02 AM
Eric,
The point being i need to order a good amount of these for the company i work for..and i would like to get the most bang for buck with 850 dollar difference between them once i get to around 13-15 that 850 dollars adds up the where i could have got an additonal one...with a 512 vs a 574..
08-10-2010 10:36 AM
Just learned Cisco was is doing an EOS on this product but thank you for the help Eric
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide