SmallNetBuilder review of RV220W

[linksysinfo]

Thought you guys would like to know...

http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-reviews/31427-new-to-the-charts-cisco-rv-220w-wireless-n-vpn-firewall

[jay.johnson1]

Yeah...

I just checked it out today finally.  As far as I can see, the router is handling business.  There was an individual on DSLreports bagging on the 220w because "2" people were having problems :-)  Check it out if you haven't seen it:

1) https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3301160

2) https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3281290

I remember when Simon and I got our WRV200's and I couldn't for the life of me figure out why his IPSEC tunnels "just worked" and mine didn't.  Come to find out, Simon had an "NTL" cable modem connection (DHCP) and I was running a "Hi-Velocity" ADSL connection (Static).  As a result, once I set my WRV200 to "static" all my vpn tunnels started working :-)

Jay

[ddiep]

Thanks guys for the reviews. I guessed RV220W performs pretty well.  So far , so good....

[linksysinfo]

Full review has now been done.

http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-reviews/31456-cisco-rv220w-wireless-network-security-firewall-reviewed

Notes:

Product	Cisco Wireless Network Security Firewall (RV 220W)
Summary	Small-biz dual-band N router with 10/100/1000 ports and SSL, IPsec and PPTP VPN
Pros	• SSL, IPsec, PPTP VPN • > 700 Mbps routing throughput • Gigabit ports with jumbo frames • Dual band N radio • IPv6 support
Cons	• Undistinguished wireless performance • Slow reboots • A few odd menu organization choices