cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
39196
Views
20
Helpful
29
Replies

FIPS 140-2 Certification

graberb
Community Member

I would love to use the Meraki full stack in my environment but the network is subject to LEIN audits every three years. Devices that pass criminal justice information are required to hold a valid FIPS 140-2 certificate. I have heard from many sources that Meraki is in the process of acquiring these certs. Does anyone know more?

29 Replies 29

So Fortinet it is.. who knows how long this next wait will be.. I can't risk further deployment of Meraki gear with this unknown not being handled in a reasonable amount of time.

Thank you for that. A ton.

Meraki is obviously not following this thread. I spent a lot of time looking for roadmaps and news. They don't want to say "FIPS, the concept breaks our system and putting that burden on every customer for the DoD / DOJ / etc isn't worth it, ever." They should say that.

Cisco should step up and say "ASA and Firepower our our platforms for customers who require FIPS."

I will also be giving up on this, I don't have 15 more months to hope that they support it.

That's your choice. I'll just continue to buy the cheapest FP1010 for FIPS and run Meraki everywhere else until Meraki gets up to speed. I love Meraki and their concepts. Now with the muscle of Cisco, I can wait. I'm patient.

Landrin Long | Network Architect
Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles
555 Wright Way, Carson City, NV 89711

I wish I was in that situation. We aren't in a place where we could run two solutions. 99% of our employees and data requires protection.

I see that the Cisco website shows version 16 of the MX firmware as compliant. I've only seen version 15 so far (beta).

Here is the page on the Cisco site showing version 16 as compliant:

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/industries/government/global-government-certifications/fips-140.html

Is there a "special" beta of version 16 available? Is it perhaps just for some particular physical models?

Thanks

We just need everyone to upgrade to 15.x, then it will become the new stable release, the 14.x train will be dropped, and 16.x will become the new public beta which everyone can use.

CMR
Meraki Community All-Star
Meraki Community All-Star

@martins@netxuk.com I see from that link that the next beta for wireless, switching and firewalling are all going to be FIPS compliant.

We're running 27.x on MRs, 14.x on MSs* and 15.x on MXs so if the rest of you all follow, as @Philip D'Ath said, we'll have FIPS compliance all the sooner.

*Not on an L3 stack of 3x MS210s as it is sorely unstable on that configuration as of 14.10.'

If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.

I'm really glad we held out for Meraki's FIPS compliancy. This is going to just make everything much nicer in my realm.

Landrin Long | Network Architect
Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles
555 Wright Way, Carson City, NV 89711

Thanks cmr,

I work for a Cisco partner and we run beta versions on most of our own Meraki kit already. Got quite a few customers running version 15 on the MX's too.

I've heard on the grape vine that only certain models of MX are going to be FIPS compliant. Don't know if this is down to the physical encryption processors in use. I'd be very happy to hear anything back from Meraki about this.

CMR
Meraki Community All-Star
Meraki Community All-Star

@martins@netxuk.com I'd think you'll be correct. I imagine some of the smaller older devices (MX64/65 etc.) will not be able to go to MX16 at all or perhaps only in a limited way.

If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.

From my Meraki rep,

Meraki MX450, MX250, and any MX6x will become FIPS compliant, but the rest of the MXs will not. So for instance, the MX84 will never be FIPS compliant.

Landrin Long | Network Architect
Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles
555 Wright Way, Carson City, NV 89711

Thanks LandrinLong,

Yeah those model numbers correspond with what I've heard. Shame about the MX84 and MX100 in particular.

For the MX84 and MX100, they are currently in development for replacements that will be FIPS 140-2 compliant that have similar price points and throughput, but the current MX84 and MX100 will not be unfortunately. At least that is what my reps and Cisco/Meraki engineers are telling me.

Landrin Long | Network Architect
Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles
555 Wright Way, Carson City, NV 89711

CMR
Meraki Community All-Star
Meraki Community All-Star

I'd hope the replacements are somewhat more performant for a similar cost, especially in terms of raw throughout as that would then be a worthwhile improvement.

If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.

edazeved
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi everyone. I am aware that this is an old post, but I believe is relevant to share this here even for future reference.

Please refer to our Meraki Device to Cloud Connectivity - FIPS document, where we list all the certifications available at this moment

Hope this helps

Eduardo Azevedo