cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
308
Views
0
Helpful
0
Replies

MPLS LDP Hello Adjacencies via SNMP (Working Sporadically)

frankgeueke
Level 1
Level 1

Hi folks. 

I'm having a problem trying to replicate the MPLS LDP hello adjacencies I see on the CLI by running 'show mpls ldp neighbor' with results from walking mplsLdpHelloAdjacencyType and other related OID's.  

Here are some 'show mpls ldp neighbor' snippets:

    Peer LDP Ident: 10.7.0.1:0; Local LDP Ident 10.7.2.1:0
        TCP connection: 10.7.0.1.646 - 10.7.2.1.43828
        State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 162371/161638; Downstream
        Up time: 7w3d
        LDP discovery sources:
          Targeted Hello 10.7.2.1 -> 10.7.0.1, active, passive
        Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
        10.7.0.1        [etc]

    Peer LDP Ident: 10.7.63.1:0; Local LDP Ident 10.7.2.1:0
        TCP connection: 10.7.63.1.26327 - 10.7.2.1.646
        State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 163080/163018; Downstream
        Up time: 7w3d
        LDP discovery sources:
          Targeted Hello 10.7.2.1 -> 10.7.63.1, active, passive
        Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
          10.7.63.1       [etc]

In this case I'd like to add monitoring to ensure an adjacency exists between this router and 10.7.0.1 and 10.7.63.1.  I walk mplsLdpHelloAdjacencyType:

[fgeueke@dev2:~ 11:53 AM]$ snmpwalk -Ob -v1 -c[snip] 10.7.2.1 mplsLdpHelloAdjacencyType |grep '\.10\.7\.\(0\|63\)\.1'
MPLS-LDP-STD-MIB::mplsLdpHelloAdjacencyType.10.7.2.1.0.0.168230913.10.7.0.1.0.0.1 = INTEGER: targeted(2)

Notice the absences of an entry for 10.7.63.1.  The router in this example is a 7604 running c7600s72033-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRE9 but I'm getting similar results for other 7600's and ASR's.  

I've had a TAC case open for over a year on this with little success - so I figured I'd post to the group.  Has anyone run into something similar?  Thanks! 

0 Replies 0