02-03-2021 03:17 AM
We'd like to know if mixing VM category as distributed deployment is a recommended set up.
A team proposed a mix of VM Medium as Primary and Secondary PAN,MNT and VM Small as (2) PSNs.
Will this pose problems after?
The intended purpose for this deployment is for device admin TACACS only.
Thank you in advance.
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-03-2021 03:44 AM
02-03-2021 03:48 AM
Is the deployment only for TACACS device admin, you can do 2 node is good enough.
Look below document help you :
https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-documents/ise-performance-amp-scale/ta-p/3642148
02-03-2021 03:44 AM
02-03-2021 03:53 AM
Thank you.
02-03-2021 03:48 AM
Is the deployment only for TACACS device admin, you can do 2 node is good enough.
Look below document help you :
https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-documents/ise-performance-amp-scale/ta-p/3642148
02-03-2021 03:54 AM
Thank you
02-03-2021 03:54 AM
Hi @jj2048 ,
please take a look at the link: ISE Performance & Scale ... search for ISE PSN Performance and ISE TACACS+ Performance.
Note: take a look at ISE 2.7 Software Download:
the OVA file for 600GB Disk for Small or Medium (PAN or MnT) is ISE-2.7.0.356-virtual-SNS3615-SNS3655-600.ova
the OVA file for 300GB Disk for Eval, Small, Medium (PSN) is ISE-2.7.0.356-virtual-SNS3615-SNS3655-300.ova
Hope this helps !!!
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: