01-29-2024 02:34 AM
Hello!
We have implemented Windows 10 native client TEAP authentication, which works perfectly if the User and the Machine is authenticated via MSCHAPv2. So the EAP-Chaning is working in the environment.
But If we want use EAP-TLS to authenticate the machine via Certificate the following error appears:
22070 | Identity name is taken from certificate attribute | |
22047 | User name attribute is missing in client certificate - Subject - Common Name | |
22002 | Authentication complete | |
22057 | The advanced option that is configured for a failed authentication request is used | |
22061 | The 'Reject' advanced option is configured in case of a failed authentication request | |
12529 | Inner EAP-TLS authentication failed |
The certificate is on the machine, the common name is name of the machine and it exist in the AD.
TEAP config is okay, the certificate is selected which to use during the dot1x authentication.
But still the Machine cannot auth itself
What could be the problem?
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-15-2024 04:29 AM
Hello!
It turned out a well known bug caused this issue:
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwf80292
BR
01-29-2024 03:23 AM
Which option you switched to EAP-TLS in TEAP properties on the supplicant settings? please note that the primary EAP authentication method is referring to the machine authentication, and the secondary is referring to the user authentication.
01-29-2024 04:56 AM
Hello Aref!
I know it as the exact opposite. Like the primary is the user and Secondary is the machine.
The above reffered logs are part of the Machine authentication logs, so I think I am right.
BR,
Mate
01-29-2024 07:03 AM
Hello Mate, you're right, my bad, I flipped them around. Do you also have a SAN value on the cert with the machine name? if so, could you please change the CAP on ISE and set the DNS SAN instead of the CN attribute?
01-30-2024 12:02 AM
Hello!
Unfortunately there is no SAN field in the certificate, although we have tried to modify the CAP according to it, but we get an authentication error during the dot1x process . Which is expected since there is no SAN field.
Thx,
Mate
04-15-2024 04:29 AM
Hello!
It turned out a well known bug caused this issue:
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwf80292
BR
04-15-2024 06:29 AM
Thanks for sharing this. Did the suggested workaround fixed the issue?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide