09-07-2021 06:28 AM
I am using ISE with AnyConnect in a lab environment, I tried switching from user authentication to machine authentication by configuring the authorization role to use computers domains on the AD instead of users (EAP Chaining), now ISE is querying both methods as the logs suggest:
12209 | Starting EAP chaining |
12210 | Received User Authorization PAC |
12211 | Received Machine Authorization PAC |
12218 | Selected identity type 'User' <= Why |
...... | |
22037 | Authentication Passed |
12124 | EAP-FAST inner method skipped |
12219 | Selected identity type 'Machine' |
..... | |
22037 | Authentication Passed |
12124 | EAP-FAST inner method skipped |
12964 | Sent EAP Result TLV indicating success= s |
12105 | Prepared EAP-Request with another EAP= -FAST challenge |
11006 | Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge |
11001 | Received RADIUS Access-Request |
11018 | RADIUS is re-using an existing session |
12104 | Extracted EAP-Response containing EAP-FAST challenge-response |
12106 | EAP-FAST authentication phase finished successfully |
11503 | Prepared EAP-Success |
15036 | Evaluating Authorization Policy |
Why is that? any configuration is missing on ISE or AnyConnect?
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-07-2021 06:41 AM
I tried switching from user authentication to machine authentication by configuring the authorization role to use computers domains on the AD instead of users (EAP Chaining)
Why is that? any configuration is missing on ISE or AnyConnect?
-I am under the assumption that ISE is still allowing the eap-fast protocol, and nothing changed on the supplicant side (AnyConnect). IMO your issue is that the client is still attempting to negotiate via eap-fast due to how your NAM profile is setup. My suggestion would be to use the NAM profile editor to tweak the configuration as you desire (comp only OR eap-fast). Note that there is a way to configure multiple "profiles (networks)" within the NAM editor. Personally for testing this would be optimal for your sake. In doing this you would get the ability to negotiate eap-tls for comp only and/or eap-fast for user/comp chaining. During your testing you would control the negotiation aspect from the client side via the NAM drop down (click one network profile versus the other). Lastly, yes, you will still need to setup and configure rad policies within ISE to support both protocols and onboarding workflows. HTH!
09-07-2021 06:41 AM
I tried switching from user authentication to machine authentication by configuring the authorization role to use computers domains on the AD instead of users (EAP Chaining)
Why is that? any configuration is missing on ISE or AnyConnect?
-I am under the assumption that ISE is still allowing the eap-fast protocol, and nothing changed on the supplicant side (AnyConnect). IMO your issue is that the client is still attempting to negotiate via eap-fast due to how your NAM profile is setup. My suggestion would be to use the NAM profile editor to tweak the configuration as you desire (comp only OR eap-fast). Note that there is a way to configure multiple "profiles (networks)" within the NAM editor. Personally for testing this would be optimal for your sake. In doing this you would get the ability to negotiate eap-tls for comp only and/or eap-fast for user/comp chaining. During your testing you would control the negotiation aspect from the client side via the NAM drop down (click one network profile versus the other). Lastly, yes, you will still need to setup and configure rad policies within ISE to support both protocols and onboarding workflows. HTH!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide