cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2374
Views
0
Helpful
6
Replies

When is bug CSCuw70713 expected to be fixed?

matthen
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

When is bug CSCuw70713 expected to be fixed?  My customer is asking for a date.

Thanks,

Matt

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

hslai
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Please discuss enhancements with our PM team.

View solution in original post

6 Replies 6

M. Wisely
Level 4
Level 4

The enhancement bug is listed as terminated which means that nothing more is going to happen with it. There is a workaround listed:

Use http with the sponsor portal fqdn to get around this problem.

Wouldn't using http leave a security gap because the session wouldn't be encrypted?  If I'm an employee using the sponsor portal to register a guest, don't I risk passing my credentials in the clear over the network?

Thanks,

Matt

ISE redirects from http to https when I go to the sponsor portal fqdn so your credentials are still protected.

Unless I am missing something here, just add the sponsor portal FQDN to the admin certificate as a SAN. Thats what we do and it works great.

Go to https://sponsorportal  > matches admin cert (as port 443) and the sponsorportal is listed in the admin cert as a SAN (DNS=sponsorportal). User then gets redirected to the https://sponsorportal:8443 > matches the sponsor portal cert (as 8443) where the sponsorportal is either the CN or in the SAN.

Works great.

Yeah, it works if the admin portal certificate can be used for the end-user facing portals. However, that defeats separate certificate purposes for portals.

hslai
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Please discuss enhancements with our PM team.