static route failover using IP SLA track

[IS34lyf]

I recently implemented this solution since we only have static routes on primary and backup circuits. Here is an example

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1 track 1 name toATT

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10 name toCox

I want to emphasize the second "ip route" statement in bold characters, somehow if i delete this line then my primary circuit fails even though i have the first line present. Is this how it's supposed to be?

[MHM Cisco World]

if the track is Down and you remove second line then the static route will remove