02-13-2018 07:20 AM - edited 02-21-2020 07:20 AM
object network GUEST-INTERNET
subnet 10.205.64.0 255.255.252.0
object network GUEST-INTERNET
nat (extranet,outside) dynamic xxx.xx.199.135
Auto NAT Policies (Section 2)
2 (extranet) to (outside) source dynamic GUEST-INTERNET xxx.xx.199.135
translate_hits = 3536082, untranslate_hits = 32663
Source - Origin: 10.205.64.0/22, Translated: xxx.xx.199.135/32
3 (extranet) to (inside) source dynamic VPN_USER_POOL interface
translate_hits = 3369448, untranslate_hits = 283060
Source - Origin: 10.254.32.0/22, Translated: 10.254.28.113/28
4 (extranet) to (outside) source dynamic EXTRANET_ANY interface
translate_hits = 33130812, untranslate_hits = 62286
Source - Origin: 0.0.0.0/0, Translated: xxx.xx.199.140/28
But users are still reporting to be using the xxx.xx.199.140 address when validating via whatismyip ?
There must be a way to Exclude and Include ?
02-13-2018 06:48 PM
Hi
Users complaining are in which subnet?
Can you share please the output of the following command:
packet-tracer in extranet tcp 10.205.64.10 8 0 8.8.8.8
02-20-2018 02:36 PM
The users on the 10.205.64.0/24 subnet.
We migrated to another firewall and it worked after we did.
So something was stuck on the firewall from making it work and I didn't have a compelling reason at the time to pull out all the nats and put them all back in.
I did do a clear xlate several times while testing.
Packets were getting to the firewall just not out to the outside world.
Thanks
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide