cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
5257
Views
20
Helpful
19
Replies

ASA & IPS

estelamathew
Level 7
Level 7

Hello Dear's,

Please see the attached design and confirm, what i m thinking is correct and it is fully redundant.

  • Web Server NIC's are in active/standby mode

  • Full  DMZ is in 1 subnet

  • IPS-1 and IPS-2 will be having inline interface pairing as per the diagram attached

  • If primary ASA fails,,the packets will be routed by DMZ-Switch-2 to Secondary ASA. 

       Packet flow will ------>   web server----NIC-1-----switch-1----switch-2----secondary ASA

Thanks

19 Replies 19

You are absolutely correct.

If you are using different switches, then there is no issue at all as long as the only way from the web server towards the ASA and vice versa is via the IPS.

Hello Dear's,

Inline pair IPS-1

gig0/0<------>gig0/1

gig0/2<------>gig0/3

Inline pair IPS-2

gig0/0<------>gig0/1

gig0/2<------>gig0/3

Please find the attched the previous topology and the current attached  topology is not fully redundant, We missed the below conditions,

For previous topology,

IF ASA-SW1,IPS-2 and DMZ-SW-1 fails there is no connectivity (buisness down)

IF ASA-SW2,IPS-1 and DMZ-SW-2 fails there is no connectivity (buisness down)

In Current attached topology:

IF suppose ASA-SW1 and IPS-1 and DMZ-SW2 fails then there is no connectivity,(buisness down)

IF suppose ASA-SW2 and IPS-2 and DMZ-SW1 fails then there is no connectivity,(buisness down)

What can be the soluttion dears i dont think so we can do it by interface pairing,IF you'll have any ideas pls suggest,I have to try with inline vlan pairing i tried but i have some doubts,

For example IPS 4240,


I have configured gig0/0 as inline vlan pair for vlan 1 and vlan 2 and on  the DMZ-SW1 i had configured trunk

what i shld configure on gig0/2,???? when i configure the same pair on gig0/2 it gives me error and i saw in user guide it is written that we should'nt configure same pair on more than 1 interface

Please please suggest .

Hello Jennifer/Paul

I need ur help on above questions,

Estela one of the major concerns is that there is only one link between each switch and the ASA. If the link fails on the primary unit the traffic will fail. Let me analyze this in detail.

Hello paul,

Attached is the new design and answer me.the problem below

  • DMZ-SW1 all ports will be vlan 2 and 2 trunk port connecting to ASA-SW1 & ASA-SW2
  • DMZ-SW2 all ports will be in vlan 4 and 2 trunk port connecting to ASA-SW2 & ASA-SW1

Can we  configure the redundant interface on ASA, 1 active interface will go to the ASA-SW1 on vlan 3 and another standby interface of active ASA to ASA-SW2 in vlan 5

PUT A SCENARIO WHEN ASA-SW2 ,IPS1 and DMZ-SW1 fails

Packet will come from DMZ-SW2 from vlan 4 and it will pass to IPS it will change to vlan 5 and do a arp request for ASA-interface ,the arp request will go to the ASA-SW1 also but it will not respond becz on ASA-SW1 the ASA interface is in vlan 3 the packet will be drop and standby interface of active ASA on ASA-SW2 is in vlan 5 which is already (ASA-SW2) down according to this scenario.

How the packet will reach ASA with full redundancy without any issues. I need a solution dears,,

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card