10-25-2013 12:53 AM - edited 03-11-2019 07:56 PM
Hey Guys,
I have added a second vlan on our ASA5505 for the wireless network (yes, I know it's not a router) and now webvpn has stopped working. Basically what happens is the ASA tries to unnat the request (which I think it shouldn't) and because of a static entry I seem to be unable to remove it resolves to the wrong network.
The rule is
static (wireless,outside) interface gw_wireless netmask 255.255.255.255 dns
The acl entry for the webvpn port is:
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any host outside_ip object-group custom_webvpn log debugging
webvpn
port 444
enable outside
dtls port 444
I hope you can help me with my problem, if I need to give any more details please let me know...
Thanks,
John
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-25-2013 12:50 PM
Hi John,
You need to remove that static NAT entry.
What it does is statically nat everything coming to the outside interface to 0.0.0.0 on the wireless interface and that doesn't make sense.
ciscoasa(config)# static (inside,outside) interface 0.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.255 dns
WARNING: static redireting all traffics at outside interface;
WARNING: all services terminating at outside interface are disabled.
What was intended with that static statement?
Patrick
10-25-2013 12:50 PM
Hi John,
You need to remove that static NAT entry.
What it does is statically nat everything coming to the outside interface to 0.0.0.0 on the wireless interface and that doesn't make sense.
ciscoasa(config)# static (inside,outside) interface 0.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.255 dns
WARNING: static redireting all traffics at outside interface;
WARNING: all services terminating at outside interface are disabled.
What was intended with that static statement?
Patrick
10-26-2013 11:00 AM
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for your response, I figured as much.. Ended up resetting it to factory defaults and rebuilding the configuration from there. Couldn't for the life of me get that entry out.
As for the intention, not a clue, I wonder how it came in as well..
Anyway, it's back working again now, so thanks a lot!
John
10-25-2013 04:17 PM
Hello John,
Agree with Patrick (kudos to u) .
What you need instead of performing a one to one translation for the wireless router is to do a port-forwarding, I guess you are looking to manage the device remotely so do the following
static (inside,outside) tcp interface 443 gw_wireless 443
access-list out_in permit tcp any host interface_ip_address eq 443
Rate all of the helpful posts!!!
Regards,
Jcarvaja
Follow me on http://laguiadelnetworking.com
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide