02-21-2014 07:35 AM - edited 03-11-2019 08:48 PM
Hi guys,
We currently are starting to change our remote access to SSL VPN. During testing I have noticed that XP will not work with the stronger encryption methods. It seems that it needs one out of the two out of RC4-SHA1 or 3DES-SHA1.
I have had a look around but cant find real definitive answers. Could you guys give me some tips of advantages and disadvantages of the two or let me know if i should just steer well clear of allowing these encryption methods to be used on our firewall.
Thanks for all your help,
MJ
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-24-2014 08:29 AM
RC4 has enough known weaknesses that the official advice from Microsoft, Cisco etc. is to stop using it; toss it in the same dustbin as MD5. E.g.
So if you can't get clients to do something modern like AES-GCM and TLS 1.2, I'd go with the 3DES-SHA1.
-- Jim Leinweber, WI State Lab of Hygiene
02-24-2014 08:29 AM
RC4 has enough known weaknesses that the official advice from Microsoft, Cisco etc. is to stop using it; toss it in the same dustbin as MD5. E.g.
So if you can't get clients to do something modern like AES-GCM and TLS 1.2, I'd go with the 3DES-SHA1.
-- Jim Leinweber, WI State Lab of Hygiene
02-25-2014 12:44 AM
Thanks James for the info, we are going to stick with 3DES-SHA1 for the next few months until XP support is dropped in June 2014.
Much appreciated,
MJ
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: