01-24-2018 08:17 AM - edited 02-21-2020 07:12 AM
All
I have an ASA HA pair where the primaryt shows 93% mem used. The secondary is at 64%.
The reason for the difference was a unique vpn that was created only on the primary. Due to there was only 1 uplink to the ISP switch. This vpn does have a redundant link through a different ASA. This redundant vpn was already in place.
I have read that memory is used up by acl's, conn table and Xlate table. ACL's expand to show each line when using show access-list.
Will the following command provide any relief? What are Pro's/con's?
object-group-search access-control
01-24-2018 09:11 AM
pro: less memory used by acls
con: acl rule lookup slower
You can reduce the memory required to search access rules by enabling object group search, but this is at the expense rule lookup performance. When enabled, object group search does not expand network objects, but instead searches access rules for matches based on those group definitions. You can set this option using the object-group-search access-control command.
HTH
Bogdan
05-10-2018 07:02 AM
Hello
I am not sure I understand the impact of "at the expense rule lookup performance".
I have checked forum and internet. It almost seems like using the command, object-group-search access-control, is a bad idea.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide