05-22-2012 01:03 PM - edited 03-11-2019 04:10 PM
All -
I have an ASA (US-HEN) on a public IP that is a fiber based connection. Then there is a private point-to-point from the same fiber service company. Both ASA are 5510 in routed mode. The second location (US-LEX) used to have a site-to-site VPN over a DSL connection which has gone away. So now there is a private point-to-point over a /32 subnet and I'm pointing the ASA at US-LEX back to US-HEN as its default gateway. Should I put the second ASA (I'm calling this a 'stub' connection) into transparent mode as opposed to routed?
Regards,
Scott
05-22-2012 01:08 PM
A quick diagram:
Internet ---- US-HEN outside ---- US-HEN ptp (192.168.0.1) ---- US-LEX ptp (192.168.0.2) ---- US-LEX inside
sec-level 0 sec-level 100 sec-level 100 sec-level 100
I have turned on permit inter and intra interface and the following routing exists:
US-HEN
1. ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [public IP gateway]
2. ip route 192.168.x.x [US-LEX] 192.168.0.2
US-LEX
1. ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1
Should I specify NAT exemptions in both directions for traffic? I would think that I wouldn't need that unless traffic is about to go over a site-to-site VPN tunnel.
05-29-2012 06:53 AM
I was also thinking about configuring it with 'ip permit any any' statements to allow all of the traffic in/out and disabling NAT. Really I just need it to function like a router at this point and not so much a firewall.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide