06-13-2016 12:50 PM - edited 03-12-2019 12:52 AM
I am not sure if I need an NAT based access-list, route map, twice NAT, or an object based NAT. I've done some reading and I feel like ACL or route-map NAT is the way to go but am looking for guidance.
My situation is:
So we have client_A (group of network IP ranges) and the rest of the world (any).
I need something like:
access-list NAT_WWW extended permit tcp object-group client_A eq 443 host 192.0.2.10 eq 7443
access-list NAT_WWW extended permit tcp any eq 443 host 192.0.2.10 eq 443
static (inside,outside) NAT_WWW (however this gets worded)
Let's say the internal server is 10.10.10.10. Where does that fit in to the picture?
Feel free to throw in other suggestions of how to do it with a workable example, either completing this method or demonstrating a different method. I've tried a few variations with a spare IP and a test internet connection and can't seem to get it right.
06-16-2016 08:10 PM
Hi
you want to redirect traffic to specific server based on source ip?
i've answered a post quite similar but it was based on service port used. The minding is quite the same.
take a look on this post:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/13046096/how-natchange-destination-ip-and-port
Do I understand well your issue?
let me know.
thanks
PS: Please don't forget to rate and mark as correct answer if this solved your issue
06-17-2016 09:34 AM
Correct.
External_Partner_A to MY_External_IP eq 443 to Internal_Server_A eq 7443
Any to MY_EXTERNAL_IP eq 443 to Internal_Server_A eq 443
Make sense?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide