FWSM NATing question
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-03-2008 06:01 AM - edited 03-11-2019 07:20 AM
Hi
i have a 6500 switch with FWSM .
Its outside interface ip address is 64.x.x.219.all the users behind the firewall are natted on the firewall with 64.x.x.220.
nat(inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
global (outside) 1 64.x.x.220 netmask *****.
we have some servers on the DMZ interface of the firewall.
My question is :
if i have another real ip subnet (for example 84.x.x.132/28) can we use any ip from this subnet to publish any server on the firewall although its outside interface is configured with another ip from different subnet??????
waiting your replies.
regards
- Labels:
-
NGFW Firewalls
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-03-2008 06:04 AM
Mohamed
Yes you can as long as the traffic for 84.x.x.132 is routed back to the outside interface of your FWSM then it will be fine.
Does this make sense ?
Jon
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-03-2008 06:49 AM
Dear jon
Thanks for your reply.
what do u mean by 84.x.x.132 is routed back to the outside interface ???
do u mean from the ISP side that they must route the traffic of 84.x.x.132 to the outside interface of the FWSM (64.x.x.x) ?????
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-03-2008 06:52 AM
Yes, if you present a DMZ server as an 84.x.x.x address to the outside then any traffic destined for the 84.x.x.x address must be routed to your site. It actually must be routed to the outside interface of your FWSM but you may have other devices under your control between the FWSM and the SP. So it's safer to say the SP must route 84.x.x.x back to your site.
Jon
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-03-2008 07:23 AM
Thanks jon
Did u test this solution??? or did u apply this configuration on a firewall before???
regards
Mohamed
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-03-2008 07:26 AM
Mohamed
I have used this configuration on Pix firewalls many times before.
Jon
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-03-2008 07:42 AM
Ok jon
thank you very much.
it was pleasure to talk with you , and i hope to be friends in future.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-03-2008 07:49 AM
Mohamed
No problem. Let us know if you run into any problems.
Jon
