- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-08-2018 01:45 PM - edited 02-21-2020 07:19 AM
object-group network obj-Costumer
network-object host 100.100.220.10
network-object host 100.100.220.20
network-object host 100.100.220.25
object-group network obj-Internal
network-object host 10.2.2.10
network-object host 10.3.10.10
network-object host 192.168.10.10
nat (outside,inside) source static any any destination static obj-Customer obj-Internal unidirectional
Will this NAT work? If yes, will the mapping be 1st-1st, 2nd-2nd entry and so on?
Or should I just do single objects for every single IP?
Thank you in advance !
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
NGFW Firewalls
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-09-2018 07:06 AM - edited 02-09-2018 12:25 PM
Hello @ddebrova,
It will be better to create 3 NATs for each one of them since you will a problem with the NAT if you do it that way, for example:
If the traffic is originated first from 100.100.220.20 is not going to take 10.3.10.10 instead it the NAT will be created with 10.2.2.10 since is the first option in the object-group.
HTH
Martha
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-09-2018 07:06 AM - edited 02-09-2018 12:25 PM
Hello @ddebrova,
It will be better to create 3 NATs for each one of them since you will a problem with the NAT if you do it that way, for example:
If the traffic is originated first from 100.100.220.20 is not going to take 10.3.10.10 instead it the NAT will be created with 10.2.2.10 since is the first option in the object-group.
HTH
Martha
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-09-2018 07:22 AM
Thank you for your response.
I was under the impression that it maps 1-1,2-2 and so on no matter where traffic comes from first like:
100.100.220.10 nats to 10.2.2.10
100.100.220.20 nats to 10.3.10.10
So , I will have to do individual mappings then.
Do you know any documentation explaining this NAT process in details. Haven't found anything clear so far.
