03-30-2009 08:20 AM - edited 03-11-2019 08:12 AM
I have a diagram to help better explain what I'm wondering. I think I'll need to, but maybe not.
My ASA has a private address on the inside interface, and a public address on the outside. Will I need to nat if my device in front is natting for other traffic?
Thanks,
John
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-30-2009 08:50 AM
Hi,
The question would be, does the fatpipe device have routes to your internal network?
If it does then there is no need to NAT on the ASA and you can have all your NAT in one place. If it doesn't have your internal networks in it's routing table then you will need to NAT on the ASA.
Regards
03-30-2009 08:50 AM
Hi,
The question would be, does the fatpipe device have routes to your internal network?
If it does then there is no need to NAT on the ASA and you can have all your NAT in one place. If it doesn't have your internal networks in it's routing table then you will need to NAT on the ASA.
Regards
03-30-2009 11:23 AM
Thanks James! The Fatpipe doesn't have our internal networks set up. It just has an "internal gateway" of my ASA's public address. I'm converting from a Symantec firewall now, and I don't see where it's natting, but I've got nat enabled on the ASA.
Thanks again,
John
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide