01-23-2003 04:55 AM - edited 02-20-2020 10:30 PM
I have a 2620 connected to 2 ISPs on the outside of my pix - i have 10 users that must be static NAT to point to one ISP and the rest will be NAT from a pool pointing to the other ISP. I would like to keep the outside interface of the PIX a private IP. I am leaning towards creating a route-map with ACL to direct the traffic accordingly.
Should I NAT on the PIX or router or both?
01-23-2003 04:35 PM
Hmm, difficult to say, you could do it on either, and it's probably much of a muchness which way you end up doing it. I'd probably do it on the router since you have a private IP address on the PIX. On the router you'd just do (assuming your inside network is 10.1.1.0/24):
ip nat inside source static 10.1.1.1 200.1.1.1
.......
ip nat inside source static 10.1.1.10 200.1.1.10
ip nat pool ippool 150.1.1.1 150.1.1.254 prefix-length 24
ip nat inside source list 100 pool ippool overload
access-list 100 permit ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
and then on the PIX just do:
static (inside,outside) 10.1.1.0 10.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
01-23-2003 05:15 PM
Thanks for the reply, but what is the need for the static on the PIX?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide