08-19-2004 08:41 AM - edited 02-20-2020 11:34 PM
We have a PIX 506e that had been working well, then
we started having problems with NAT users getting
flaky (inconsistent) connections going out. Yesterday all NAT traffic stopped. From what I can
see I am not passing any traffic.
I can ping addresses on both interfaces and have reloaded the configuration numerous times as well as
wiping the configuration completely and reloading it
from scratch.
Any ideas?
Below is the relevant configuration:
PIX Version 6.3(1)
interface ethernet0 auto
interface ethernet1 100full
nameif ethernet0 outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside security100
hostname pixfirewall
ip address outside xx.yy.zz.2 255.255.255.192
ip address inside 192.100.100.1 255.255.255.0
ip audit info action alarm
ip audit attack action alarm
pdm history enable
global (outside) 1 xx.yy.xx.3-xx.yy.xx.20 netmask 255.255.255.192
global (outside) 1 interface
nat (inside) 1 192.100.100.0 255.255.255.0 0 0
08-19-2004 10:04 AM
Hello again,
Your config is good. Have you check your logg messages if there are some more detailed error messages.
logging on
logging buffer warning
Do a:
show logg
show xlate
show xlate detail
Again why are you using NAT and PAT in the same time ?
Try with just PAT:
global (outside) 1 interface
nat (inside) 1 192.100.100.0 255.255.255.0 0 0
sincerly
Patrick
08-20-2004 03:55 AM
Patrick,
The reason that I did NAT and PAT was (and I read this somewhere) that if I ran out of NAT addresses that the PAT addresses would take over until a NAT address was available. Is that not an efficient way to do things?
When I do a sh xlate it shows 7 in use and 7 max. NATing inside addresses to outside addresses. So, it would seem that all is setup correctly.
Any thoughts?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide