08-14-2006 06:49 AM - edited 03-10-2019 01:41 PM
Is there an IDS signature release for the 4.1 platform for this vulnerability ?
The bulletin only mentions the 5.x platform.
08-14-2006 09:18 AM
IDS version 4.x doesn't have the capabilities required to detect these vulnerabilities with an acceptable level of fidelity, so we have no plans to release a signature to cover MS06-040 in an official 4.x signature update. This custom sig will work in 4.x but it is much more prone to false positive;the 5.x version uses the meta engine which is not available in 4.x.
String.tcp
service ports: 139,445
regex:
\xc8\x4f\x32\x4b\x70\x16\xd3\x01\x12\x78\x5a\x47\xbf\x6e\xe1\x88[\x00-\xff]*\x05\x00\x00[\x00-\xff]\x10\x00\x00\x00[\x00-\xff]{5}\x00\x00\x00[\x00-\xff]{6}\x1f\x00([\x00-\xff]?{16})[\x00-\xff]{4}[\x01-\x25]\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00[\x01-\x25]\x00\x00\x00([0-9A-Za-z\x2e]\x00)*\x00\x00[\x00-\xff]{4}\x00\x00\x00\x00(([\x07-\xff][\x02][\x00][\x00])|([\x00-\xff][\x03-\xff][\x00][\x00])|([\x00-\xff][\x00-\xff][^\x00])|([\x00-\xff][\x00-\xff][\x00-\xff][^\x00]))
08-15-2006 11:33 AM
So when can the Cisco 2800 series be upgraded to engine 5.x?
I think it's misleading to advertise the 1800, 2800 and 3800 products as security products if signatures cannot be written for them.
08-16-2006 09:40 AM
According to the bulletin, I see that you have released S245 with SigID 5799.0 which looks like a version for the v4.x platform. Is this correct?
Is it NOT enabled by default because it is prone to False-Positives?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide