cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1772
Views
5
Helpful
4
Replies

Sizing ASA FP/FTD and FP NGIPS

Michael Gioia
Level 1
Level 1

This is great for ASA sizing

https://apps.cisco.com/ccw/cpc/compare/ucsComparePage?selectedValues=model_asa5506,model_asa5506wa,model_asa5506hx,model_asa5508x,model_asa5512x,model_asa5515x,model_asa5516x,model_asa5525x,model_asa5545x,model_asa5555x,model_asa5585-s10f10-k9,model_...

 

Specifically showing the serialisation of all possible filters/engines (fundamentally and mathematically appropriate as it slows down the deeper the inspection/parsing/extraction goes.. this is critical for me to see.)

 

Do we have anything for FP NGIPS appliances ?
(Could probably HTTP parameter 'hack' the https://apps.cisco.com/ccw/cpc/compare/ucsComparePage page to add the selected values for FP appliances ?)

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Marvin Rhoads
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Cisco recommends we use this tool for FTD/NGFW:

https://ngfwpe.cisco.com

The output is not as verbose; but they have consistently declined to make a more comprehensive tool available - even to partners.

View solution in original post

4 Replies 4

Marvin Rhoads
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Cisco recommends we use this tool for FTD/NGFW:

https://ngfwpe.cisco.com

The output is not as verbose; but they have consistently declined to make a more comprehensive tool available - even to partners.


The output is not as verbose; but they have consistently declined to make a more comprehensive tool available - even to partners.

< sad face >

@Marvin Rhoads...

If you pick 5Gb+ for bandwidth profile and have all engines/filters ticked except for the last one, being VPN (aka, all prior checkboxes..).

Do you get any options ? (Common packet profile and 40-80% uti)

 

:/

It gives no options. :/

SSL decryption is the killer. Cisco (nor most others) won't commit to (or recommend) trying to do SSL decryption at full line rate for that high of throughput.

That said, they have tweaked SSL decryption performance for some of the more recent releases (introduced in hardware as of 6.2.3 and on by default in 6.3 and 6.4) and the tool might not yet reflect that.

I'd check directly with your Cisco SE if high throughput SSL decryption is important to you. Other security options (WSA, Umbrella, ETA etc.) may be more architecturally appropriate to address the underlying security need.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card