12-30-2010 02:49 AM - edited 03-11-2019 12:28 PM
hi experts,
i think that the nat-control doesnot effect the static and nat-control is only for the nat commands ? right ? if there is a below scenario will static nat be required or not for the inbound traffic ? asa contains the inspect icmp as well , Router 2 has DG as Outside ASA
User PC -----Router 1-----[INSIDE-100]ASA [OUTSIDE-0]----Router 2
If i ping from Router 2 TO Router 1 will static be required or not ?
If Router 1 IS 172.16.10.10 , i think that we require following static and an ACL on the ASA Outside interface
static (inside,outside) 172.16.10.10 172.16.10.10
can there be any scenario where it works without any static ? I was trying in my lab and found that it works without static as well .
12-30-2010 03:25 AM
Hi ,
nat-control requires you to have a nat statement for any flow going from a lower security level (inside) , to a higher security level (outside)
You can see if nat-control is enabled : sh run nat-control .
If is disabled ( no nat-control ) you will be able to send packets from inside to outside without nat.
Dan
12-30-2010 03:31 AM
Yes, you are right. "nat-control" is only for dynamic NAT statement, so for traffic from low to high security level, you are still required to configure static statement.
If you are pinging from Router 2 to Router 1, static NAT statement is required.
You can either configure static NAT statement or NAT exemption (NAT 0 with ACL).
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide