cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
322
Views
10
Helpful
2
Replies

OSPF Network command

phithang
Level 1
Level 1

Is it possible to have an interfac belonging to two separate OSPF processes as follows:

!

router ospf 200

log-adjacency-changes

network 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

network 10.0.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

!

router ospf 100

log-adjacency-changes

network 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

network 10.0.254.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

!

Although the command allow me to enter this in, when I issue the show ip ospf 100 interfaces command, it does not show the 10.0.0.0 network listed as an interface. It seems that which ever routing process I first put that network in, that is the routing process that will use it and no other processes use that network even though they are configured.

Any comments?

2 Replies 2

Harold Ritter
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

The interface can only be owned by one process, the first process under which the interface is configured.

Hope this helps,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

phithang
Level 1
Level 1

Thanks for the reply. That is what I thought, but someone else was telling me otherwise.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card