12-26-2012 06:56 PM - edited 03-03-2019 06:53 AM
I understand that the Expedited Forwarding (EF) model is used to provide resources to latency sensitive real-time, interactive traffic.The EF model uses one marking -- DSCP 46.
so the binary value is 101 11 0. Here bits 2 and 1 specify the drop probability (11 - high); so that means high probablity of dropping the packet.instead of this, cisco should have used 101 01 0 (dscp value 42 and drop propabilty here is low ) to acheive the best results Right?.. Any thoughts?..
If EF does NOT follow the drop preference rules of the assured forwarding model,then how the IOS handle this.. what is the meaning of those two drop preference bits here.
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-26-2012 11:04 PM
Hi,
EF doesn't follow the drop precedence rule and these bits have no special meaning for IOS.It's not Cisco who decided the value of the EF and AFxx DSCP code points. I think these values for these bits was chosen from the tos bits meaning:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1349
Regards.
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
12-26-2012 11:04 PM
Hi,
EF doesn't follow the drop precedence rule and these bits have no special meaning for IOS.It's not Cisco who decided the value of the EF and AFxx DSCP code points. I think these values for these bits was chosen from the tos bits meaning:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1349
Regards.
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
12-27-2012 06:09 AM
Hi Alain,
Thanks for answering this question..
So that means as soon as the ios sees 1 0 1 in the left most bits, the drop precedence bits have no special meaning right?
Is my understanding correct..
Thanks,
Arun
12-27-2012 07:12 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
So that means as soon as the ios sees 1 0 1 in the left most bits, the drop precedence bits have no special meaning right?Is my understanding correct..
Yes and no. First you need to understand QoS RFCs are recommendations. I.e. ToS interpretation/treatment is up to you. Second, by default, most Cisco devices generally ignore ToS. I.e. you need to configure the device to treat ToS as you desire, although some Cisco devices do have some default behaviors with "activation" of QoS features.
Additionally, as Alain noted, Expedited Forwarding (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2598, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3246) isn't part of the RFC for Assured Forwarding (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2597, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3260), i.e. drop precedence wasn't defined for it.
PS:
You might also want to review http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4594 to see how it all works together.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide