05-12-2005 07:15 AM - edited 03-02-2019 10:44 PM
It appears from the following text in a Cisco manual
"Routes configured with the connected keyword affected by this redistribute command are the routes not specified by the network router configuration command."
That the REDISTRIBUTE CONNECTED statement is an alternative to specifiying the directly connected interfaces on a NETWORK statement of a routing protocol. And further that networks directly connected to a router with REDISTRIBUTE CONNECTED statement present do not need to be included in the NETWORK statements.
Is this a correct understanding?? Any other implications or gotchas of configuring it one way versus the other?
05-12-2005 10:31 AM
You have also posted this same question on the WAN Routing and Switching forum where I have posted an answer. I suggest that we consolidate the discussion on the WAN Routing and Switching forum.
HTH
Rick
05-12-2005 11:58 AM
Unfortunately, I posted it here first, then realized the other forum was probably more appropriate.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide