cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
599
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

CSPM 3.0 strict error checking

echee
Level 1
Level 1

I've tried CSPM 2.3.x and 3.0 to define a PIX object with overlapping subnets. Let say the subnet connecting to e0 is 10.5.0.0/16 and the subnet connecting to e1 is 10.5.5.0/24. In this case, the CSPM doesn't accept me. Is there any workaround or I need to give up CSPM? Due to historical reasons, I cannot alter the design of the subnets.

3 Replies 3

smahbub
Level 6
Level 6

Configuring that directly on the PIX will give you problems so that is why CSPM will not allow it. The PIX will be very confused as to which networks it owns where. Renumber that 10.5.5.0/24 subnet… make your own history.

brford
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

echee,

So CSPM has a setting that forces it to check the configuration before you write to the device. That used to be a check box. If you are sure that the overlapping subnet is your only issue I would disable the CSPM checking feature and then push the policy out. Remeber to turn it back on immediately after writing the device.

Liberty for All,

Brian

Brian Ford | brford@cisco.com | brford@yahoo.com | 51 75 61 6c 69 74 79 20 6d 65 61 6e 73 20 64 6f 69 6e 67 20 69 74 20 72 69 67 68 74 20 77 68 65 6e 20 6e 6f 20 6f 6e 65 20 69 73 20 6c 6f 6f 6b 69 6e 67 2e | Email me when you figure this out.

Dear Brian,

Thanks for your reply. However, I can't even define the PIX object in the CSPM if the interfaces/networks attached to it is overlapped. Therefore, I can't further define the objects and the rulebase.

Thanks.

echee