01-03-2003 02:33 PM - edited 03-09-2019 01:33 AM
Does this signature provide coverage for CVE list candidate CAN-2002-0845?
This CVE number is not referenced in the NSDB description.
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-06-2003 01:54 PM
Yes, 5245 should provide coverage for this vulnerability. HTTP chunked encoding is a rarely used feature of the HTTP protocol, so we felt it better to write a generic signature to cover a range of similar buffer overflow problems than to author specific narrow signatures.
01-06-2003 01:54 PM
Yes, 5245 should provide coverage for this vulnerability. HTTP chunked encoding is a rarely used feature of the HTTP protocol, so we felt it better to write a generic signature to cover a range of similar buffer overflow problems than to author specific narrow signatures.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide