03-21-2021 05:57 AM
I have just purchased a Cisco RV260 with the intent of beefing up security on our home network a bit, from the default router (now in bridge mode) provided by our ISP.
I have run into the following issue with the firewall settings though. My rule set is very basic and the configuration of the Cisco-device is mostly default (I am syslog'in to a Linux-box on my VLAN which works flawlessly but that's it). These are my rules:
My problems:
Firmware version should be the latest: 1.0.01.02.
I am using the Cisco-device to provide NAT to one single VLAN, which allows Inter-VLAN Routing and Device Management.
05-15-2021 02:10 PM
Hi
For solving this issue with IRC,
Step-1:
a) you should first delete the access-rule for IRC that you have added
b) You dont require a access rule to permit for IRC...and in this case its not working even with permit not becos of the firewall in the overall sense...BUT its not working for you becos of how IRC connection works...
- for every IRC-client connection to the remote IRC-server on any TCP-ports 6660-7000 range, the remote server will initiate a TCP connection on port 113 back to the client
- so here you will need a Port-Triggering rule instead of a Access-Rule
Step-2:
Assuming that you have already created 2 service records as below:
name: IRCOutbound
Proto: TCP; Start-port: 6660; End-Port: 7000
And
name: IRCInbound
Proto: TCP; Start-port: 113; End-Port: 113
a) After deleting the access-rule above and apply, go to the Port-Triggering page under Firewall and add an entry as below:
ApplicationName: MyIRC1
Trigger_Service: IRCOutbound
Incoming Service: IRCInbound
Interface: WAN
thats all, apply and then save
Now connect from the IRC-client behind the RC260, this should work...
Br
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide