10-08-2009 10:25 AM
Quickvpn is fine. Using my fixed wan adress I can have the connection from my laptop, or at least quickvpn looks happy. (and in the rvs4000 conection status I can see that my client is on
But no remote IP adress is given, so the quickvpn connection does no do anything and I cannot see my local network.
I'm expecting at this stage two connection on my laptop. Standard-public and local IP from my lcoal network.
Any idea ?
Thanks for everything
Phil
10-08-2009 02:08 PM
Phil,
Yes, I also found that when I remote from my local network 192.168.10.2 to my cousins RVS4000, which has a LAN address 192.168.1.X, I do not get assigned a IP address of 192.168.1.X.
But if you look at the VPN configuration on the RVS4000, there is not mention of a IP address pool for remote users.
Like unlike yourself, I am finding I am having ZERO difficulty working with IP hosts on the remote RVS4000 using the new quickvpn utility.
I am wondering if the Hosts at the remote location have a different default router or if the RVS4000 is the only router onsite ?
I found that remoting into RVS4000, I can still TFTP upgrade the LVS systems, but my cousins RVS4000 is the default gateway for the devices on that network.
If the RVS4000 is not the default gateway for IP hosts on the network, but only there for VPN purposes, enable RIP2 between the RVS4000 and the other default router. This should let the default router know that a new host is in the network that is connected via the RVS4000.
This functionality is fantastic at the price point offered for the RVS4000.
regards Dave
01-18-2010 12:37 PM
Here's some explanations that might help people understand, read my last post: https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3101666#3101666
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide