cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1698
Views
5
Helpful
4
Replies

ASR1001-X recommendation for redundancy method

0rsnaric
Level 1
Level 1

I have two ASR1001-X routers running 3.16.02.S, each with 8GB DRAM.  We have three WAN links, and are using BGP to load balance with our providers.  Currently only 1 router is up and running, just got the other one.


What is the recommended method of pairing these two devices, given that BGP is the only routing protocol, and my goal is to provide the least amount of downtime should one router fail?  I've been reading up on RPR and NSF, but not sure that is the correct configuration for my environment.


Thanks!

4 Replies 4

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
If I remember correctly, I recall you may need 16 GB to enable software redundancy, and without it, don't believe RPR or NSF are going to be very useful to you.

So, if one router fails, it fails fully, and then the question is how quickly the network converges to only use your remaining router.

The documents I've been reading all say 8GB is the required memory.  So if that is correct, would RPR with NSF (or without?) be the way to go? Or just do HSRP/GLBP?

Ah, well if you can run two IOS instances in software with 8 GB, that's an option then, but RPR and NSF vs. HSRP/GLBP aren't mutually exclusive, as they serve different purposes.

The second IOS image is to deal with a major IOS fault, such that the second image can take over. This isn't something I don't believe is seen very often, so it's unclear how much value this offers, but if the equipment has the capability, like chicken soup, it probably wouldn't hurt to enable it. I.e. normally, for such redundancy, there's a second hardware "brain" to take over.

NSF keeps forwarding packets after higher logical levels (in the stack) have failed and during their recovery. I haven't read what exactly an ASR1001-X support, but it may, in the case of switching to its second/backup IOS process might keep forwarding packets and not "drop" as far as NSF aware neighbors are concerned. (The latter might be an issue with your WAN side, as the external WAN devices, might not be NSF aware.)

Something like HSRP/GLBP might benefit from RPR and NSF too, as they too might not see the peer "drop".

Awesome, thank you so much for the input.  Very helpful!