BGP Route advertisement

Sandip Barot · ‎07-08-2021

Hi Guys,

We have an identical configuration for BGP connection to 2 sites(but with different prefix advertisement) and BGP connection is up with both. We can receive neighbor routes for both. We have selective route advertisements with prefix-list as in config below.

However, our router does not advertise route with one of the site (neighbor 10.150.2.150) while it advertise to other site(neighbor 169.254.11.10)

Any idea about what could be wrong or to check ?

Thanks in advance.

=====================================
router bgp 64520
bgp log-neighbor-changes
network 10.10.5.0 mask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.1.0
network 192.168.100.0

network 192.168.116.16 mask 255.255.255.255

neighbor 10.150.2.150 remote-as 1
neighbor 10.150.2.150 local-as 64525
neighbor 10.150.2.150 description "bgp to Hub"
neighbor 10.150.2.150 soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor 10.150.2.150 route-map ToHub out

neighbor 169.254.11.10 remote-as 2
neighbor 169.254.11.10 local-as 64521
neighbor 169.254.11.10 description "bgp to Gcl"
neighbor 169.254.11.10 soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor 169.254.11.10 route-map ToGcl out

ip prefix-list ToGcl seq 10 permit 10.10.5.0/24
ip prefix-list ToGcl seq 20 permit 192.168.1.0/24
ip prefix-list ToGcl seq 30 permit 192.168.100.0/24 => These 3 routes get advertised
!
ip prefix-list ToHub seq 10 permit 192.168.116.16/32 => This is not getting advertised

route-map ToGcl permit 10
match ip address prefix-list ToGcl
!
route-map ToHub permit 10
match ip address prefix-list ToHub

(2)
UTA-R#sh ip bgp neighbors 10.150.2.150 advertised-routes

Total number of prefixes 0

UTA-R#sh ip bgp neighbors 169.254.11.10 advertised-routes
BGP table version is 40, local router ID is xxxx.6

Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 10.10.5.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
*> 192.168.1.0 10.10.5.254 0 32768 i
*> 192.168.100.0 10.10.5.254 0 32768 i

Total number of prefixes 3

(3)

UTA-R#sh ip route

Gateway of last resort is xxxx.1 to network 0.0.0.0

S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via xxxx.1
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 6 subnets, 3 masks
C 10.10.5.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/1
L 10.10.5.1/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/1

S 192.168.1.0/24 [1/0] via 10.10.5.254
S 192.168.2.0/24 [1/0] via 10.10.5.254
S 192.168.4.0/24 [1/0] via 10.10.5.254
S 192.168.100.0/24 [1/0] via 10.10.5.254
S 192.168.116.0/24 [1/0] via 10.10.5.254

Jon Marshall · ‎07-09-2021

The BGP network statement needs a matching route in the IP routing table and you don't have a route for 192.168.116.16 255.255.255.255 in your routing table.

Try adding this static route -

ip route 192.168.116.16 255.255.255.255 10.10.5.254

Jon

Sandip Barot · ‎07-09-2021

Thank you Jon,

We had a route for the network defined for the full network but seems we need specific /32 route as your comment.

S 192.168.116.0/24 [1/0] via 10.10.5.254

After adding that route it is getting advertised now.

"ip route 192.168.116.16 255.255.255.255 10.10.5.254"

Another prefix which is not advertised is L (directly connected)

L 192.168.100.100/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0

How could we advertise or add routes for directly connected network in BGP? there is a reference to "redistribute connected" command but how to distribute only specific directly connected route to only one remote AS.?

in our case advertise directly connected 192.168.100.100/32 to only neighbour 10.150.2.150

Jon Marshall · ‎07-09-2021

But you are advertising out 192.168.100.0/24 so that would cover the directly connected route wouldn't it ?

Basically BGP requires an exact match in the routing table as you have seen ie. the prefix and the subnet mask must match.

For directly connected you could always use "redistribute connected" but that would still only advertise 192.168.100.0/24 and not the host entry.

Jon

Sandip Barot · ‎07-09-2021

Another prefix which is not advertised is L (directly connected)

C 192.168.100.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0
L 192.168.100.6/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0

L 192.168.100.100/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0

How could we selectively advertise or add routes for directly connected network in BGP? there is a reference to "redistribute connected" command but how to distribute only specific directly connected route(/32) to only one neighbour and not all neighbours.?

in our case advertise directly connected 192.168.100.100/32 to only neighbour 10.150.2.150

Jon Marshall · ‎07-09-2021

You can use a route map with your redistribute statement but I don't think it will do what you want.

If you redistribute connected it will advertise 192.168.100.0/24 not the host entry.

Jon

Giuseppe Larosa · ‎07-09-2021

Hello Jon,

>> If you redistribute connected it will advertise 192.168.100.0/24 not the host entry.

I totally agree with you.

These L routes are just place holders for IP addresses of interfaces.

Hope to help

Giuseppe

Giuseppe Larosa · ‎07-09-2021

Hello @Sandip Barot ,

as @Jon Marshall has tried to explain you the L /32 routes are just placeholders that tell you what IP address the interface of the local router has on the connected subnet.

However, the prefix is always represented by the C connected route.

Just to be clear in the past for many years L routes /32 did not exist in IP routing table.

To see your own IP addresses you had to use

show ip int brief

Now, with the addtion of L routes you see this info in the IP routing table but it is not representing a prefix just an interface.

So simply ignore L routes you don't need to advertise them ( not only in BGP but in any routing protocol )

Hope to help

Giuseppe

Sandip Barot · ‎07-09-2021

Thanks for your responses @Jon Marshall @Giuseppe Larosa

So, it seems it is not possible to advertise single host /32( from directly connected network) to one neighbor only.

Giuseppe Larosa · ‎07-10-2021

Hello @Sandip Barot ,

>> So, it seems it is not possible to advertise single host /32( from directly connected network) to one neighbor only.

You can advertise the connected prefix to a single neighbor and this is enough for every practical need in real world.

I don't see any real use case where someone would need / like to advertise the interface address the so called L "route".

A router works on prefixes interconnecting different IP subnets and advertises subnets / prefixes in routing protocols like BGP if configured for doing it.

Hope to help

Giuseppe

Sandip Barot · ‎07-10-2021

Many thanks for your inputs and I really appreciate your help, Giuseppe and Jon. I still need some more clarification to understand this a bit further.

So, for the below directly connected route we can only advertise full prefix [ie presented with "C"-192.168.100.0/24] and not a single IP from the subnet ie "L 192.168.100.100/32". or some other IP from the subnet for example 192.168.100.111 ?

C 192.168.100.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0
L 192.168.100.6/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0

L 192.168.100.100/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0

We have a requirement where we wanted to advertise only single public IP to the neighbor from the directly connected subnet, so wanted to check.

With static routes "S", we can do a single IP but is it limitation as above for directly connected route where we can`t do a few IP or single IP from the prefix ? ie as below- works and advertsied fine.

192.168.116.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
S 192.168.116.0/24 [1/0] via 10.10.5.254
S 192.168.116.16/32 [1/0] via 10.10.5.254

Jon Marshall · ‎07-11-2021

I don't think you are going to be able to advertise the IP assigned to the interface on the router but for other IPs out of that subnet you could add a static route with an the exit interface as the next hop eg.

ip route 192.168.100.111 255.255.255.255 gi0/0

and then you can advertise in BGP.

Why you would want to do this is another question though.

Jon