05-24-2013 12:10 PM - edited 03-04-2019 08:00 PM
As a caveat, I am a student and asking this question for help with a final project I have due in a few weeks. With that said, I am not looking for a thorough answer, just some guidance to make sure I am headed in the right direction and understanding the material.
I have to establish a WAN for a company based in Denver (21 servers, fully staffed IT dept) with 130+ offices scattered throughout the midwestern states. For secure connectivity, this is my thought process so far. I would like to use VTI to provide secure connectivity between each of the offices and the main office, is there a limit to how many connections a single router interface will support using VTI? Can I configure a single router interface with 10? 50? 130+? Or is the interface limited to one VTI connection?
Thanks in advance for any help!
Sam
05-24-2013 12:26 PM
Sam
A router interface is not limited to a single VTI. I have a customer who is currently running over 400 VTI on a single router interface.
HTH
Rick
05-24-2013 12:40 PM
Sam,
Did you mean Virtual template interface by VTI?
Subeh
05-24-2013 12:45 PM
I assumed from the context that Sam was talking about Virtual Tunnel Interface. And it was in that context that I talked about having 400 tunnels terminating on a single router interface. If he meant Virtual Template Interface then I was off the mark.
HTH
Rick
05-24-2013 02:16 PM
You know you can also do MPLS, you can also do IPSec tunnels, or VTI with IPSec, depends on your needs and budget.
05-24-2013 03:19 PM
I was referring to virtual tunnel interface, I apologize, I didn't realize there were two definitions for VTI! Richard, does the interface do okay with that many terminations on a single interface? It would seem that there would be some congestion issues. So, for my entry point into the headquarters network and servers, a single high-end router should provide sufficient connectivity and bandwidth?
Mohammed, I thought of a couple of different ways to have secure tunnels. From my research, VTI just seemed to make the most sense with 130+ connections terminating at the same place. I quickly got in over my head trying to figure out how to use L3 tunneling with point-to-point GRE with IPSec. I also looked at a couple of other Cisco based options, namely DMVPN and Easy VPN. Additionally, if I understand it correctly, VTI utilized IPSec for security, to me the advantage is having configurable, secure tunnels to each outlier connecting to a small number of router interfaces at the main office.
05-25-2013 07:37 AM
Sam
This customer is using a fairly high end router to terminate these VTI tunnels and so far we have not observed anything that indicates that the router is having a problem with it. There is occasional congestion, but the congestion is with the amount of bandwidth from the Internet and not a limitation of the router.
And your understanding is correct that VTI does use IPSec to encrypt the data going through the tunnels.
HTH
Rick
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide