06-25-2010 11:34 AM - edited 03-04-2019 08:53 AM
We have a WAN on MPLS that is using
BGP. We are getting 25 to 35 second convergance but we need to do better. I have the router config's and a drawing of the
network if someone thinks they could help us improve this. Thanks in advance.......
06-29-2010 09:17 AM
Should I expect to see a difference it reconvergance time between the two?
James Brockman
Network Engineer
Ahold Account
HP Enterprise Services
Telephone +1 717.240.5568
Email James.Brockman@hp.com
1149 Harrisburg Pike, Carlisle, PA 17013
06-29-2010 09:20 AM
More than likely not since bgp timers are controlling convergence. I usually test mine by shutting the interface.
06-25-2010 01:01 PM
AS 6Xnnn
Private
Giant C Store
On the right in the light blue....
06-29-2010 09:32 AM
James,
BGP keepalives are important to validate BGP sessions health and to avoid routing blackholes.
if you are setting your keepalive interval & holddown timers in production you need to be very careful. Setting the timers too small results in fast peering deactivateion detection and lead to false positives and disruption of BGP session and exessibe route flapping,
For fast-external-failover, this feature is enable by default for eBGP sessions using the BGP process command bgp fast-external-failover and used for point-point links on a none-shared link when the peers are directly connected. Using it on NBMA and ethernet interfaces might be inefficient.
A more advance version is called fast peering session deactivation which can be setup using the neighbor command "neighbor 1.1.1.1 fall-over. This feature applies to both iBGP & eBGP and does not rely on interface state instead uses IGP. Once the IGP route disappear, the BGP session gets immediately torn down and used for none-direct conencted peers.
Francisco
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide