03-20-2018 10:15 AM - edited 03-07-2019 12:22 AM
Hello community,
Someone can help me understand how to implement MAP-T, I've read the little information you get but not having a complete topological diagram with addresses on both sites I don't understand how to implement this feature.
I have done in my lab a little practice to try to implement but I can't get it back, these are the documents I have, if I need the file in eve I attach them too.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipaddr_nat/configuration/xe-3s/nat-xe-3s-book/ip-nat-divi-v4v6.pdf
not cisco but is great for get a idea how to work: https://support.qacafe.com/knowledge-base/map-t-testing-with-cdrouter/
03-20-2018 10:58 AM
Hi Rafael,
The following presentation fro CiscoLive contains a lot of detail information about MAP-T implementation. Let us knpw if you have any specific question.
https://www.ciscolive.com/global/on-demand-library/?search=BRKSPG-2606#/session/1421636381208001l63a
Regards,
03-20-2018 02:42 PM
I just saw the whole presentation and I'm at the same point, it's amazing that cisco doesn't have a complete configuration documentation (a sh run of all the involved devices) for a feature it has already supported for several years.
I have the same doubts, I don't know if a DHCPv6 is mandatory for my demo or I can do it with static IPv6 in the interfaces, from where the public IPs in the presentation 1.1.1.1, everywhere what I get are the map-t lines and the concepts are not specified in detail with examples in a topology, to whom belongs the DMR and the BMR if it is in the origin or in the destination, Reading the RFC I saw that the same configuration of MAP-T is exactly the same in the CE and the BR I have gaps that I would only solve by looking at a topology with the ipv4/ipv6 addresses and the shuns since in the video you don't see where they come from, for example the public 1.1.1.1 if it comes from a traditional nat, etc. etc.
03-22-2018 09:47 PM
Hi Rafael,
> I just saw the whole presentation and I'm at the same point, it's amazing that cisco doesn't have a
> complete configuration documentation (a sh run of all the involved devices) for a feature it has already
> supported for several years.
We could do better a documenting MAP-T, although to my knowledge, we do not have a CPE that supports MAP-T. What are you using as the CPE in your case?
> I have the same doubts, I don't know if a DHCPv6 is mandatory for my demo or I can do it with static
> IPv6 in the interfaces,
DHCPv6 is not mandatory. It would be preferable for a large production deployment, but for the lab, static will do just find.
I would definitely recommend the following tool that should help you with the MAP-T concepts.
http://6lab.cisco.com/map/MAP.php
Please let us know if you have any additional questions,
Regards,
08-06-2018 10:49 PM
Hi Harold,
I too was attempting to configure a Cisco device as a CPE, can you please confirm Cisco does not support MAP-T/MAP-E as a CPE?? Would be very helpful to know.
Thanks,
Patrick
08-07-2018 06:08 AM - edited 08-07-2018 11:02 AM
Hi Patrick,
Cisco devices support BR functionality only.
The CPE functionality is not supported on the ASR9k, ASR1k or ISR either.
For CPE functionality, you need to either look at a few CPE vendors (IPFusion and others) or open source implementation.
Regards,
08-30-2018 01:09 PM
Sorry to ask, but I was told to configure MAP CE on a Cisco IR829.
Could you confirm that does not support map CE.
11-14-2021 09:53 PM
Hi,
Cisco IR829 does not support MAP CE. As a matter of fact, none of Cisco IOS or IOS-XE devices supports MAP CE.
Currently, the only Cisco devices supporting MAP CE are IR509 or IR510 DAGW, running TinyOS-based Resilient Mesh firmware.
Thanks,s
Eric
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide