06-13-2012 07:46 AM - edited 03-04-2019 04:39 PM
I have a Cisco 2611XM connected to a Sonicwall NSA 240 on int0/0. Both connections are hard coded to 100Mb/s Full-duplex. I have recently replaced the cable but I am receiving the following in the sh int results
PM-ROUTER-01#sho int
FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is AmdFE, address is x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x (bia x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x)
Internet address is x.x.x.x/24
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 4/255, rxload 12/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:02:52
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 4968000 bits/sec, 719 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 1786000 bits/sec, 548 packets/sec
159689 packets input, 164500913 bytes
Received 68 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
63 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 27 overrun, 36 ignored
0 watchdog
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
102736 packets output, 32300324 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
I have been looking for answers to this and have had little success. Can anyone assist with what the overrun errors are and a possible resolution? Thanks in advance.
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-13-2012 07:57 AM
Hello Scott,
these interface error counters mean that the device has received bursts of traffic that the network driver of the interface could not handle.
The device is not capable of wire speed on 100 Mbps link so from time to time it may be unable to receive all the frames that are sent from the other network device in bursts.
To be noted the ratio of errors to receive packets is 63/159689 = 3.9 10^ -4
This is not critical and it hasn't a big impact on the network if most user traffic is TCP based.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
06-13-2012 07:57 AM
Hello Scott,
these interface error counters mean that the device has received bursts of traffic that the network driver of the interface could not handle.
The device is not capable of wire speed on 100 Mbps link so from time to time it may be unable to receive all the frames that are sent from the other network device in bursts.
To be noted the ratio of errors to receive packets is 63/159689 = 3.9 10^ -4
This is not critical and it hasn't a big impact on the network if most user traffic is TCP based.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
06-13-2012 08:01 AM
Would you consider the device incapable of handling the traffic then, meaning I should consider upgrading the unit? I just started with a new company and am trying to find bottle necks or substandard equipment during my discover phase. I thought I found the specifications for the unit which showed 100Mb/s Full-duplex for e0/0 and e0/1. Thanks for the quick reply
06-13-2012 08:14 AM
Hello Scott,
in the long term the answer is yes: a C2611XM cannot handle two FE interface at wire speed according to published datasheets.It can process 20,000 pps in CEF switching mode.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide