01-30-2007 04:51 AM - edited 03-03-2019 03:33 PM
Hi,
we are looking for a solution wherein our requirement is to provide load-sharing per packet. We are about to migrate on Cisco GSR 7600 series.We do not want ML-PPP option to club 4xE1 for 8Mb throttle. Can any one help us out?
01-30-2007 05:06 AM
Hello,
CEF can be configured to do per packet load sharing. "ip load-sharing per-packet"
BUT:
Per-packet load balancing via CEF is not supported on Engine 2 Gigabit Switch Router (GSR) line cards (LCs).
The 7600 should support it.
Regards, Martin
01-30-2007 06:40 AM
Hi Martin,
Thanks for info.
But our 12416 GSR is true for 2nd option Engine 2 Gigabit Switch Router (GSR) line cards (LCs). Can we have any solution for the above.
01-30-2007 06:45 AM
Hi,
what is the underlying problem you try to solve?
Regards, Martin
01-30-2007 07:02 AM
Hi Martin,
As per our knowledge, GSR 12416 does not support per-packet load sharing due to its architecture. It supports only per-flow load sharing. Our problem is that we want to club 4xE1 ckts and wants to achieve 8Meg throttle. With per-flow, our end customer would not be able to utilize the bandwidth effectively. in current setup, we have deployed ESR 7206 and per-packet can be acheived. Hope this piece of information explain of what are we trying to achieve. Please suggest if anysort of workaround can be done.
02-01-2007 04:49 AM
Hm.
Seems you can not get what you want, but could get what you do not want: MLPPP.
Another (theoretical?) option would be Inverse Multiplexing ATM (IMA).
Regards, Martin
08-16-2007 09:37 AM
Martin & rajeev128,
I am trying to do the exact same thing. CEF per-packet load share across multiple circuits. I have a 7600 (720+MSFC4) and the command does not exist. Very frustrating.
However, but I have seen documents that say CEF per-packet can be done on a 7600. But it seems to be on SX code which I can not load on my MSFC4 engine supports. (only SRB)
Any ideas anyone?
Does anyone know if a 7600 with a MSFC3 or lower card using SX IOS code can do CEF per-packet? Or even "no ip route-cache" ?
thanks,
pj
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide