ā06-04-2013 05:32 AM - edited ā03-04-2019 08:05 PM
Hi,
I want to permit Internet access on my router from my inside users.
I thought that I onyl need permit for DNS server (we have inside DNS which foward to outside DNS).
But as I test - I need to permit www and 443 as inbound traffic. (for 3handshake, connections ...)
pls tell me what is better/more secured:
interface gigabitEthernet 0/1
ip access-group 5 in
1.
access-list 5 permit tcp any eq 443 host x.x.x.x
access-list 5 permit tcp any eq www host x.x.x.x
or
2.
access-list 5 permit tcp host x.x.x.x eq established
thank you for your time,
Keli
Solved! Go to Solution.
ā06-04-2013 07:06 AM
Hi,
The more secure way would be to implement either CBAC or zone-based Firewall but if these are not viable options then the reflexive ACLs are in my opinion more secure than the established ACL( because this is easily spoofable).
Regards
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
ā06-04-2013 07:06 AM
Hi,
The more secure way would be to implement either CBAC or zone-based Firewall but if these are not viable options then the reflexive ACLs are in my opinion more secure than the established ACL( because this is easily spoofable).
Regards
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
ā06-05-2013 02:56 AM
thank you Alain for reply.
I will certanly try reflective ACL or ZBF...
best regards,
Indira
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide