cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
601
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

Policy base routing issue; please help

vinodk_gupta
Level 1
Level 1

Hi,

Our remote location is connected with HO with two ISP. Primary path is ISP1 & Backup Path is ISP2.

Now we have configured Policy Base Routing & My Objective was below.

1.       Remote location will access 172.26.4.232 & 172.26.7.45 server via ISP2 & vice versa, except this traffic all other Normal traffic will go via ISP 1.

2.       If ISP 1 down then normal traffic will routed via ISP2

3.       If ISP 2 down then 172.26.7.45 & 172.26.4.232 traffic will go via ISP1.

Here I am achieving point no 1 & 2 but partially point no. 3. In depth point no 3, at HO location traffic is routed on ISP1 but at remote location traffic is not routed on ISP1 due to set next-hope ip 172.26.16.100 & 172.26.16.100 is reachable every time.

I am sharing the HO & Remote Location configuration as well as diagram.

What should more need to be done at our end to achieve point no 3. Please suggest.

2 Replies 2

Giuseppe Larosa
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hello Vinod,

verify if in route-map configuration the verify-reachability command is supported

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/iproute_pi/configuration/guide/iri_prb_mult_track_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html

if so you can check if the next-hop is alive or you can track an ip address that is behind ISP2

Hope to help

Giuseppe

still problem not resolve.

Note: If ISP 2 connected on ISP 1 router & defining "set ip next hope 5.6.7.2 " then my all problem has been resolve. but i want to use two router at remote location. Please hel how can i resolve this issu.