Rate limit on sub interface multiple ip's in cisco 7200

[Gagandeep_Singh_1997]

Hii team ,

i create sub-interface and assign two ip's to it . i work on Cisco 7200 router 

i want to set rate limit on both ip's

ip access-list extended ACL_2_646_PRIMARY
permit ip host 192.168.1.2 any

ip access-list extended ACL_2_646_SECONDARY
permit ip host 192.168.10.2 any

class-map match-any CLASS_2_646_PRIMARY
match access-group name ACL_2_646_PRIMARY

class-map match-any CLASS_2_646_SECONDARY
match access-group name ACL_2_646_SECONDARY

policy-map POLICY_OUT_2_646
class CLASS_2_646_PRIMARY
police 20000000 4000000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop

class CLASS_2_646_SECONDARY
police 10000000 2000000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop

class class-default
fair-queue

interface GigabitEthernet0/2.646
description GAG_PHARMA-60617
encapsulation dot1Q 646
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.252 secondary
no rate-limit input
no rate-limit output

no snmp trap link-status
no cdp enable

when i run this cmd on sub interface , get following error 

JAL-CORE-RTR-1(config-subif)#service-policy output POLICY_OUT_2_646
CBWFQ : Not supported on subinterfaces

so any one help me to resolve how i rate limit using ip base on one sub-interface  using multiple ip's

[Mark Elsen]

  - @Gagandeep_Singh_1997        Review this thread : https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/cbwfq-on-gige-subinterfaces/td-p/1323821

 M.

[julian.bendix]

Whoa, been a while since I got my hands on a Cisco 7200.

Yeah this seems to work only on parent interfaces. Look at this:

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/quality-of-service-qos/qos-policing/10104-qos-subint.html 

[Giuseppe Larosa]

Hello @Gagandeep_Singh_1997 ,

I would suggest to try without the class class-default block because that fair-queue triggers CBWFQ that it is not supported

or use a class-default with no actions.

Hope to help

Giuseppe

[Joseph W. Doherty]

If also help if you would identify the IOS version being used.

BTW, have you tried applying the policy map under the main interface?