02-13-2009 09:24 AM - edited 03-05-2019 06:39 AM
Is is possible to setup two incoming fiber links from a 6509 to a 3750. The goal is to setup a redundant fiber link should 1 gbic go bad (example). Is what I am describing GB ether channeling? Seems like this would create a spanning tree loop and yet it seems this should be possible. Any thoughts appreciated!
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-13-2009 10:07 AM
You need to setup etherchannel on both ends. Here's a config example.
02-13-2009 09:43 AM
Hello Daniel,
if you don't configure them on both ends to be part of an etherchannel STP will block one link.
STP is able to deal with link redundancy and technically it is better to speak of bridging loops because STP has been thouoght to avoid them.
if both are fiber links you can bundle them you will get redundancy and more bandwidth.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
02-13-2009 09:54 AM
Thanks for the quick response!
For clarification: Are you saying I should only set the ether-channel up on one end for each fiber? Does it matter which end (3750 or 6509)that I set it up on?
02-13-2009 10:07 AM
You need to setup etherchannel on both ends. Here's a config example.
02-13-2009 09:45 AM
You could create an etherchannel which "bonds" them together creating a 2 gig channel. If a link fails, the channel stays up because it still has one good link left. From a spanning tree perspective, it's a single link. You can also run to separate fiber cables and have spanning tree block one of them, preventing a loop. If the active one fails, the other will become active and forward traffic. In the second scenario there could be a small outage as STP converges.
Hope that helps.
02-13-2009 03:07 PM
////////6509////////
interface GigabitEthernet10/10
no ip address
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree portfast disable
channel-group 25 mode on
interface GigabitEthernet11/10
no ip address
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree portfast disable
channel-group 25 mode on
interface Port-channel25
no ip address
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
//////ON 3750////////
interface Port-channel1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/49
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 1 mode on
spanning-tree portfast disable
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/50
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 1 mode on
spanning-tree portfast disable
02-17-2009 04:11 AM
Thanks to all who responded. Applied this weekend and it's working out very well. Appreciate the help!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide