08-02-2016 09:42 PM - edited 03-05-2019 04:25 AM
Hi All,
I'm trying this since long time and still not able to figure out why it is not working. so decided to post into this forum hoping to get some help.
I have a scenario like single destined IP and sources are many. Since I'm doing static route seemed not possible , so decided to use PBR.
created a access-list and route-map and applied to correct interface i believe.
But neither i can see matches in access-list nor in route-map. Router i'm using is cisco 3825.
Both next-hop Ip are directly connected to same router.
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-05-2016 04:17 AM
OK, you've got a lot going on here and since much of this is technically going in and out the same interface you may have to open a case with Cisco. However here are a few things I do see:
1- In your permit 31 statement you specify next hop verify-availability. This requires the interface sees a CDP neighbor on it. I'm guessing a neighbor isn't seen on that particular sub-interface, so I'd try removing it.
2- You've got the route map applied to both the major interface and the sub interface. Just have it on the sub-interface as I assume it applies only to that interface.
3- Some of your other route map instances (ie 9,20,32) do not point to valid next hop IPs. It must be an IP of a directly connected subnet. That might fix some things.
4- If the static host route did not work without the PBR, then that could be an indication of a larger issue.
Hope this is of some help to you.
08-03-2016 03:54 AM
Perhaps if you provided a config it may be easier to determine what the issue is.
08-03-2016 11:25 PM
08-04-2016 01:18 PM
Thanks. Please clarify, is just the instance you have highlighted not working in the route map and all the others are?
08-04-2016 08:46 PM
No others are also not working. I have highlighted this for your reference only.
08-05-2016 04:17 AM
OK, you've got a lot going on here and since much of this is technically going in and out the same interface you may have to open a case with Cisco. However here are a few things I do see:
1- In your permit 31 statement you specify next hop verify-availability. This requires the interface sees a CDP neighbor on it. I'm guessing a neighbor isn't seen on that particular sub-interface, so I'd try removing it.
2- You've got the route map applied to both the major interface and the sub interface. Just have it on the sub-interface as I assume it applies only to that interface.
3- Some of your other route map instances (ie 9,20,32) do not point to valid next hop IPs. It must be an IP of a directly connected subnet. That might fix some things.
4- If the static host route did not work without the PBR, then that could be an indication of a larger issue.
Hope this is of some help to you.
08-06-2016 10:48 PM
Thank you very much for your great support.
After removing route map instances 9/20/32, matches are now seen in access-list and route-map as well.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide