cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
286
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

RV110W Nat problem

davide003
Level 1
Level 1

Good Morning,

i have a question for the community :)

 

My configuration:

Modem router Telecom for WAN connection (192.168.1.1)

Cisco RV110 (192.168.1.100) for manage 2 local LAN with different class (192.168.2.x and 192.168.5.x) that can not communicate each other.

 

The request is NAT a port for an Ip address on VLan (2.x)

I had configured the Telecom Router with this rule (TCP EXT 82 -> TCP INT 82 to IP 192.168.1.100 "cisco"), after i created a rule on Cisco (TCP EXT 82 -> INT 80 to 192.168.2.10).

The packet arrive with destination (i checked with wireshirk) but on different port for example:

91.252.189.137  192.168.2.105 TCP 74 [TCP Retransmission] 22080→84 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=14000 Len=0 MSS=1380 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=1259661 TSecr=0 WS=32

 

Why the port are different.

 

1 Reply 1

davide003
Level 1
Level 1

I find the problem, the RV110 not support the NAT Traversal :(

That's why the port are wrong.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card