01-11-2019 06:39 PM - edited 03-05-2019 11:10 AM
Can someone assist me? SG 350 connected to an rv042, only native clan has internet access.
All Vlans can ping RV042 Router Just VLAN 100 and 200 can’t get internet access.
i have an SG350 with Native Vlan 192.168.1.1
-Vlan 100= 192.168.100.2
-Vlan 200= 172.29.240.2
01-11-2019 07:59 PM
Hello,
The nature of this problem suggests either and border device that's been configured to translate requests from the ip addresses/network that belong to vlan 1 and/or a switch that does not have ip routing enabled, but this is unlikely because the VLANs can hit the gateway device. But in order to be certain, we would want to see the following information, which would greatly aid in troubleshooting;
1. Are the two vlans that are unable to access the internet a new addition to the switch?
2. Could you paste an output of the switch configuration? You could enable ssh on the switch and pull the config via a show run command.
3. If you have access to the gateway device, paste an output of its nat configuration
Thank you.
01-12-2019 12:10 AM
01-12-2019 01:38 AM
01-13-2019 09:19 PM
01-13-2019 09:56 PM
01-15-2019 07:01 PM
01-15-2019 07:04 PM
01-16-2019 01:37 AM
01-16-2019 08:35 AM
Thanks for the information about your SG350. I am guessing it is more likely that the issue is with the RV042. Can you provide information about it? In particular we would want to see information about whether it has routes for the 2 subnets that are not getting Internet access. Also looking for information about how its address translation is set up.
From a device in the subnets that are not getting Internet access are you able to ping the address of the RV042?
HTH
Rick
01-16-2019 05:42 PM
01-17-2019 06:45 AM
You have provided the config of the SG350 and the output of show ip route from it. These show clearly that the SG350 is routing for vlans 1 and 100 and is routing them over the routed port Gig26 with the RV042 as the next hop. You have also provided a screenshot of the routing page of the RV042. And clearly it has routes for the subnets of vlan 1 and vlan 100 with the SG350 as the next hop. So it is pretty clear that the problem is not a routing problem.
The other likely cause of symptoms like this is address translation. Can you provide information from the RV042 about what it is doing for address translation? Or can you post the config of the RV042?
HTH
Rick
01-14-2019 12:27 AM
01-12-2019 12:27 PM
In addition to the advice about NAT given by Malone, I want to add the following;
In the device datasheet I can see that the SG350 supports IP routing, but see some routing statements that are not clear in your configuration.
ip route 172.29.240.0 /22 192.168.1.1
ip route 192.168.100.0 /24 192.168.1.1
The 172.29.240.0 /22 appears as a directly connected interface (interface vlan 100) on the switch. 192.168.100.0 /24 appears as directly connected on interface vlan 1. Could you elaborate on what device has 192.168.1.1?
If indeed it is the switch (as you say), then those routes are redundant because they are directly connected interfaces. If it is your router, then I would delete those routes and replace them with a default route pointing to the RV.
ip route 0.0.0.0/0 {ip address of the router}
Hope this helps.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide